New Delhi: The Lower house of the Parliament, Lok Sabha, on Monday witnessed an engaging discussion on a very concerning issue related to the death of Peacocks in the nation. Peacocks are the National Bird of India and are linked with the pride and prestige of the Indian Republic. The same was discussed in the Question Hour in Lok Sabha which made Minister of Environment, clarify the present situation and bring up recommendations for future as well.
Questions asked in Parliament
The main discussion took place with the objective reasons being raised, which were further answered by the Minister. Earlier, the questions were related to what steps the government is taking to save the lives of peacocks. The question mentioned how heatstroke is a major reason for the increasing number of deaths. Further, the supplementary questions raised mention of how well the government is taking steps to collaborate further with international organizations to work on it.
Also Read:- NASA is running out of time to bring Sunita Williams back as the new SpaceX
Religious Background and History
It is a notable fact that the peacock is the most regarded and admired bird in India. It is known for its feathers and rich, beautiful appearance. In historical texts, it is also evident that Lord Shiva’s son Kartikey used a peacock as its carrier to visit places. More than that, peacock feathers are still associated with Lord Krishna and his divinity and delight. It is used in households as a symbol of the presence of the almighty and is regarded by people all across.
Extinction of Animals and Birds
It was highlighted how drastically there has been a decrease in the strength of the squirrels, peacocks, and other birds that are not visible. How they are either being endangered due to environmental issues, scarcity of water, or other reasons. The government did make sure to give an apt reply, over making sanctuaries and taking initiatives like the breeding centers. But still, it needs major reforms. There have been a lot of non-governmental organizations working on such initiatives, but with no recognition and bare minimum funds, the government should further promote the initiatives and policies that can engage them as well.
