The Supreme Court in a recent hearing expressed strong disapproval of the National Testing Agency (NTA) due to significant problems in the administration and management of the NEET-UG 2024 exam. These problems include exam paper leaks, mishandling of exam materials, and idiosyncratic decision-making processes, all of which threaten the examination’s integrity and raises concerns over the NTA.
Security Lapses Identified
The Court pointed out serious security lapses, such as incidents of exam paper leaks in Patna and Hazaribagh. At one center, unauthorized access occurred because the rear door of the secure storage area was left open. Additionally, transporting question papers via e-rickshaws and private couriers posed a significant risk. The Supreme Court stressed that the NTA must implement strict and effective security measures to prevent such breaches.
Concerns Over OMR Sheet Management
The Court raised concerns about the NTA not specifying a time for sealing OMR sheets after the exam, which could lead to tampering. The use of private invigilators without NTA oversight was also criticized. The Court recommended better supervision and oversight to prevent unfair practices and ensure the exam’s credibility.
Errors in Distribution and Protocols
There were significant errors in distributing question papers at twelve centers, where incorrect sets were given out. This was attributed to either the irresponsibility of city coordinators or communication failures. The Supreme Court advised the NTA to review and improve its protocols to prevent future errors.
Initially, the NTA awarded grace marks for an unclear question, resulting in an incorrect list of top scorers. After the Supreme Court’s intervention and expert analysis, the results were revised. The Court emphasized the need for a reliable system that ensures fair outcomes without yielding to external pressures.
Inconsistency in Decision-Making
The Supreme Court criticized the NTA’s inconsistent handling of compensatory marks for 1,563 candidates. Initially, marks were awarded, then retracted, and a re-exam was suggested. The Court stressed the importance of making well-considered decisions to maintain fairness and public trust, noting that indecisiveness undermines the examination’s integrity.
While the Supreme Court did not find systemic failures in the NEET-UG 2024 exam, it emphasized that the NTA must avoid inconsistent practices and improve its examination process. The Court’s directive serves as a critical reminder for the NTA to maintain the sanctity and reliability of competitive exams in India.
